ISSN 1327-9556
Vol. 20, Issue 1, 2016April 29, 2016 AEST
The visible voice: Typographical distinction in thesis writing
The visible voice: Typographical distinction in thesis writing
Articles in Vol. 20, Issue 1, 2016
Vol. 20, Issue 1, 2016
- EditorialNigel Krauth, Kevin Brophy, Donna Lee Brien
- Radicalising the scholarly paper: New forms for the traditional journal articleRoss WatkinsNigel Krauth
- The visible voice: Typographical distinction in thesis writingWelby Ings
- The performative exegesisPaul Williams
- Discarding the disclaimer? Reappraising fiction as a mode of biographyJames Vicars
- Closure and the novelAndrew Craig
- Cartesian dreams, engagement aesthetics, and storytelling strategies in the online spaceJessica Seymour
- Marginalising children’s reading experiences: From series books to paratextual readingVassiliki Veros
- Writing for transition: The role of food studies in the general academic writing classroomRosemary Williamson
- ‘In losing we have something to gain’: Examining the analogous movements of ‘mobilising’ absence in literary language, authorial impulse, and elegiac writingRuby Todd
- Beyond IS…Creative writing with English PrimeBrentley Frazer
- TEXT poetry and prose April 2016Dominic Christopher, Benjamin Brown, Patrick West, Paddy O’Reilly, Brentley Frazer
- TEXT reviews April 2016Marcelle FreimanSusan Taylor SuchyMoya CostelloJessica GildersleeveDominique HecqTse Hao GuangBen KunklerAnn VickeryLinda WesteChloe WilsonJack RossOwen BullockRose LucasMary PomfretCaitlin MalingMonica CarrollHelen GildfindRuby Todd
Ings, Welby. 2016. “The Visible Voice: Typographical Distinction in Thesis Writing.” TEXT 20 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.25304.